printer friendly version
Frank Scott-Walford was the man that the Leeds City directors
turned to when Gilbert Gillies tendered
his resignation as secretary-manager in 1908. He had done enough
during his three years in charge of Southern League Brighton and
Hove Albion to convince City's board that he could get the club
promoted to the top flight.
There was wide interest in the position at Elland Road when it
became available, but Scott-Walford was the directors' unanimous
choice and they quickly entered into discussions to agree terms,
delighted with their selection. It was a clear endorsement of
the man's charismatic
appeal and standing in the game.
Scott-Walford always cut something of a flamboyant figure, with
his extravagant waxed moustache and penchant for sporting buttonholes,
straw boaters, market umbrellas,
bowler hats, caps and plus fours. But he was no one dimensional
dandy and there was enough substance to a man well schooled in
football matters to give real hope he could lead City into the
Promised Land of the First Division.
Frank Scott-Walford was born in Perry Barr, Birmingham, around
1866, and trained as an engineer,
giving his profession in the 1901 Census as a fitter. He was always
a keen follower of football, joining Tottenham as an amateur goalkeeper
in the late 1880s. He went on to become the club's first registered
professional and also worked for them in an administrative capacity.
Scott-Walford later played for London Caledonians, Lincoln, Small
Heath (later Birmingham) and Aston Villa. After leaving Villa
he appealed successfully to the Football Association for reinstatement
as an amateur. His real aptitude, however, always lay in management
and administration, and he is credited with the formation of the
Enfield and District League. He was an experienced referee, officiating
at a number of Southern League matches, and in September 1900
took charge of a benefit match between Spurs and Millwall. He
also enjoyed cricket and cycling.
In March 1905, Scott-Walford was appointed manager of Brighton
and Hove Albion on a five-year contract. He replaced John Jackson,
who had formed the club in 1901, when they were admitted to the
Second Division of the Southern League. Within two months of Scott-Walford's
arrival at the Goldstone Ground, all but three of the players
had departed the club, giving the newcomer the not inconsiderable
task of having to build a side from scratch. He managed to do
so in double quick time, enabling the club to start the 1905/06
season, but he had to pay a high price.
Desperate times call for desperate measures and Scott-Walford
trawled far and wide for new men. He was accused of approaching
players at other clubs before their contracts had expired, and
an FA Council was appointed to hear the outcome of an investigation
into a series of irregularities. Twelve months later, on 2 April
1906, the Council found him guilty as charged
and announced that he would be suspended from management from
16 April until 1 August that year.
back to top
Scott-Walford inspired Albion to some decent performances during
his time at the helm. In his first season, though they finished
in the bottom four, they beat Swindon Town 3-0 in the FA Cup.
The following season they improved massively, finishing third
in the League. In 1908 they were back in the lower reaches of
the table, but had a spectacular 1-0 victory at First Division
Preston North End in the FA Cup before losing to Liverpool after
When Gilbert Gillies resigned as secretary-manager of Leeds City
in February 1908, Scott-Walford was one of 90 applicants for the
vacant post. He was the successful candidate and happily accepted
the offer of the job when it was made on 25 March, though he still
had two years left to serve on his contract at Brighton. The City
directors entered into discussions with the Sussex club's board
to arrange his release but negotiations were protracted. Albion
were reluctant to allow him to leave, and fought hard to keep
him. In the end they accepted the inevitable and promised that
when they could arrange a replacement, Scott-Walford would be
allowed to join City.
Former Middlesbrough and Crystal Palace manager John Robson,
who was later in charge of Manchester United, eventually took
over at the Goldstone and Scott-Walford took up his post at Elland
Road on 1 April. The Yorkshire Post reported, "His work with the
Brighton and Hove Albion club in the last three years has been
marked by signal success and it is with great regret that the
directors and supporters of that club are parting with his services."
Flaneur wrote in the Leeds Mercury on 30 March after Leeds lost
to Oldham: "It will be for the new secretary-manager, Mr Scott-Walford,
to so remodel the team that next season the City record shall
be more worthy of the support the club already receives. Mr Gillies
showed, when he was appointed to the position, that it was possible
for an association manager of experience to build up a good side.
Perhaps if the purchase of players had throughout been left entirely
to him Leeds City would have had an equally good side today. Mr
Scott-Walford may be given more freedom in the matter of team
Mr Gillies was permitted, and, if so, Leeds City should rise out
of the ruck at the bottom of the table next season. It is too
much to suggest that the club will this year attain even the moderate
position held twelve months ago, when, though they were below
their three Yorkshire rivals, they occupied tenth place in the
When Scott-Walford arrived, City were in a perilous position,
fifteenth in the table and only six points clear of the bottom
two, requiring four points from as many games to secure their
Second Division status. They earned a point at Clapton Orient
on April 4 but it was a further two weeks before they got their
first win, by 3-0 at Elland Road against Stockport County. Safety
was secured the next day with the 3-1 defeat of Cup finalists
Wolves, prompting the Yorkshire Post to crow that "Leeds were
on the up grade".
Even though funds were strictly limited, Scott-Walford was already
off in pursuit of new players, signing centre-forward
Adam Bowman from Brentford on the day of the Wolves match.
Eleven of City's existing first team pool were released at the
end of the season, and Scott-Walford sought to rebuild by recruiting
from the Southern League he knew so well. Tom
Rodger, Dickie Joynes,
Jimmy Burnett, David
Dougal and Willie
McDonald followed their manager from Brighton to West Yorkshire
during the summer. Another five men were recruited from Southern
League outfits and a letter to the Leeds Mercury noted that "The
men who have been got together for this season are some of the
best who played in the Southern League last season, and when they
are well known to each other on the field I think they will be
a credit to the club." It was reported that Scott-Walford's investment
that summer amounted to some £2,000.
Flaneur wrote in the Leeds Mercury at the start of the 1908/09
season, "Mr Scott-Walford has been given a much freer hand
than was Mr Gillies, who has now settled down comfortably at Bradford
Park Avenue, and this should be for the good of the club. Mr Gillies
did admirably in the first season of the Leeds City club, and
had he been permitted to continue the team building process, I
do not think that the shareholders' meeting after last season
and the committee of inspection would have been necessary."
City opened the campaign with a 1-0 victory against Tottenham
Hotspur, prompting Flaneur to write: "Had a stranger with even
the smallest knowledge of the temperament of the average football
crowd dropped casually
into the Elland Road ground at a quarter past five on Saturday
afternoon, he would not have considered it necessary to ask which
side had won. It would have been quite obvious to him, on seeing
the smiling faces and great enthusiasm all around, that the home
team had gained the verdict. Had he observed further that Mr Scott-Walford
made a point of shaking hands with each of the Leeds City players
as the teams left the field, he might have also deduced that the
new manager of the club had passed through an anxious hour and
a half, and was very jubilant at the result. And in both deductions
he would have been correct. The new Leeds City team had justified
the faith of Mr Scott-Walford in their powers by defeating the
smart Tottenham Hotspur side by one goal to none, and the manager
had justified his position as sole selector, in the eyes of the
big crowd of nearly 20,000 people who had assembled to see this
City send off.
back to top
"I know enough of the average Leeds football spectator to feel
sure that had the City team suffered defeat in this first match,
Mr Scott-Walford's experiment in putting practically a new side
into the field would have been severely criticised. The new manager
took a bold sporting chance in selecting seven players who had
previously not worn the Leeds City colours ... and the venture
was justified by its success."
In the Edwardian period, the role of secretary-manager was chiefly
administrative in nature, there to act as diplomatic buffer between
the directors and the players. Selection was usually left to a
committee with the manager on occasion the hapless recipient of
some perverse and nepotistic decisions with directors basing their
views on which players they most liked rather than who would do
the best job. As the Mercury reported, Scott-Walford successfully
campaigned to be given sole jurisdiction over the make up of the
team. It was reported that "Mr Scott-Walford knows his business
and that the directors made a wise move leaving the constitution
Under the new man's leadership, City were as high as sixth in
the table by December 1908, and, after special training at Ben
Rhydding near Ilkley in the New Year, they pulled off a rare win
in the FA Cup at the expense of Oldham. However, the rot set in
thereafter and the Peacocks trailed in a disappointing 12th by
the end of the season.
Scott-Walford brought in former Brighton centre-half Tom
Morris in February 1909 after being denied when he first attempted
to sign him; he proved a superb buy, emphasising the manager's
eye for talent. He was often described as the best centre-half
in the Second Division.
1909/10 was a real challenge.
After an opening day victory by five goals against Lincoln, the
season yielded only a dire struggle against the need to seek re-election.
The campaign ended in turmoil when the club's shareholders staged
a revolt against the board. Scott-Walford was forced to respond
to letters of complaint as irate supporters called for an urgent
with directors to discuss both the club's financial difficulties
and their onfield problems.
It was painfully apparent that keeping the club going was the
most challenging of tasks. At an extraordinary general meeting
at the beginning of September 1910, it was revealed that the bank
was owed around £7,300 and there were total liabilities of £10,800.
Scott-Walford frequently had to find money himself to cover the
players' wages over the summer months and he was owed £3,500 by
There were accusations from shareholders that City's directors
were incompetent and too weak to hold the club's management to
account. The Leeds Mercury: "A shareholder pointed out that even
the directors admitted that there had been bad management in the
past, and what he wanted to know was what control the new directors
would have over the management, in view of the agreement with
the present manager. (Cries of 'None whatever,' and counter cries
of 'Order.') Mr Masser said that ... he felt sure that the sort
of men they would elect would not be the sort to be managed by
anybody. The affairs of the club would be managed by a professional
manager, but the business and capital of the company would be
managed by the directors."
One shareholder offered words of support for Scott-Walford, saying
of the management, "They sold one man last year, and the profit
on that man paid the whole salary of the manager and his clerks.
At present they had a team that had cost them absolutely nothing,
and they all believed they had a tip top team. They were all young
players, with years of football in them, and they ought to be
given a chance."
There was never much money available to add to the playing strength
and Scott-Walford had to manage on a shoe string. After his original
tactic of recruiting from the Southern League, he later moved
on to seeking out raw and unproven talent from Ireland; in 1909
he came up trumps by signing Billy
Halligan and Tom Mulholland
and in 1910 he returned with Mick Foley, Joe
Enright, George Cunningham,
Alec Creighton and the
gifted Billy Gillespie.
Gillespie was the pick of all the signings that Scott-Walford
made for Leeds. The Irishman was on the verge of joining Linfield
until the City manager began discussions with him. He quickly
persuaded him to turn professional and throw his lot in with the
Elland Road club. Gillespie never fully realised his potential
with City but became a major star when he moved on to Sheffield
Scott-Walford addressed his new men in the club programme for
the opening game of the 1910/11
season: "Should your efforts deserve success, and it is denied
you, we shall extend our sympathy, when you do badly we shall
still think you have done your best." It was a hollow promise
and there was only to be more bitter disappointment; the imports
were of patchy quality and generally struggled to make an impact,
though a nine game unbeaten run in February and March 1911 helped
City secure an eleventh place finish.
back to top
Once again, Scott-Walford spent the close season toiling in Ireland.
The well of talent was starting to run dry and this time he brought
back a mediocre bunch. City had a desperate 1911/12
campaign, bumping along in the lower reaches of the table.
Finances continued to be difficult and just before Christmas the
club sold Gillespie to Sheffield United for £400 to keep the wolves
from the door. Two months later, Scott-Walford was forced to strenuously
deny that Hugh Roberts
would go the same way. There was little chance of any improvement
on the field until the club could resolve its financial problems,
and there seemed to be no light at the end of this particular
Scott-Walford's health was now creaking under the pressure and
by the early months of 1912 he had had enough.
He wrote to vice chairman Joe Henry in February: "At the last
board meeting I was instructed to prepare a scheme to continue
the club, forming a minimum financial outlay to agree with the
income from all sources derived in the present year's working,
and to call a special meeting of the board to present the scheme
and discuss my agreement with the company, which expires on the
31st March next.
"I have prepared a scheme, and should like to discuss the same
along with you and Mr Hepworth
any day this week."
The scheme was never considered and as the end of Scott-Walford's
contract neared, he wrote a letter to the directors, which was
published in the local papers in March: "Gentlemen, - Re my agreement.
After very serious consideration, and recognising the unsatisfactory
financial position of the club, in fairness to myself, I think
it is my duty to inform you that I find it impossible for me to
conduct the affairs of the club any longer under present existing
"As you know, I have had to meet expenses, players' wages, etc,
times without number, also to advance transfer fees, signing on
fees, and summer wages during the past three years, which has
been reported at directors' meetings, and has been duly notified
in the minutes.
"The strain of these worries has caused a breakdown in my health,
for, as you all know, I have been ill for some considerable time.
I should, therefore, feel grateful if the directors will endeavour
to relieve me of the financial obligations
that are due to me from the club on or before March 31st, 1912.
"I sincerely hope that you will not consider this letter in any
way disrespectful to any of you. I recognise the kind courtesy
and consideration I have always received from the present directors,
but I feel it is a duty that I owe to my wife and family, and
you will agree it is not fair that a servant of the company should
be continually called upon to meet the club's liabilities.
"I must, therefore, kindly ask you to make proper financial arrangements
or relieve me of my duties as secretary and general manager of
the club on March 31st next."
If the letter was intended to get the board to pay the manager
his due, it backfired. The directors took the letter as Scott-Walford's
resignation, which they accepted. Without deigning to reply, they
quickly placed an advertisement for a replacement.
Nevertheless, there was no ill feeling from the club towards
Scott-Walford and he was given a number of mementoes at a dinner
at the Cyprus Cafe in Leeds in April. Club captain Tom Morris
presented him with a large silver boat-shaped flower bowl, on
which was inscribed: "Presented to Mr F Scott-Walford by the players
and staff of the Leeds City Football Club, April 17th 1912." He
also received an inscribed gold medal and his wife was given a
silver-mounted, oak biscuit box.
It was reported at the beginning of April that Scott-Walford
had been appointed as secretary at Nottingham Forest in succession
to Fred Earp. It seemed that someone had jumped the gun for Forest
instead gave the job to Bob Masters.
Scott-Walford eventually resurfaced as manager of Southern League
Coventry City in 1914, taking over from Robert Wallace.
The West Midlands club had just finished bottom of the table
and were thus relegated to the Second Division. With the oncoming
spectre of war in Europe, it was all Scott-Walford could do to
find 11 players fit enough to take the field. Understandably,
the season was a financial disaster and when business was wound
up in 1915, the accounts revealed that the manager was still owed
£100 in unpaid wages. This was all too familiar a tale for Scott-Walford
after his ill fated days at Elland Road.
The trail of Scott-Walford's career runs cold after his departure
from Coventry and nothing else is known about his football dealings.
He earned a living as a mechanical engineer and died in Croydon
on 27 June 1935.
It was unfortunate for a man who had shown himself so adept at
the business of football management in earlier days that he should
run aground in the financial difficulties of not one but two clubs.
But he was only one of many Leeds managers who would disintegrate
under the yoke of such bitter fiscal distress.
back to top